CuBox

Christopher Browne cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Fri Jan 20 01:55:05 UTC 2012


On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Syed Faisal Akber <faisal-nMFrlatgk0VeoWH0uzbU5w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 12-01-19 02:17 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
>>
>> Saw this reporting in the availability of a pretty-itty-bitty-ARM-based
>> system
>> http://suihkulokki.blogspot.com/2012/01/cubox.html
>>
>> It's not as small or cheap as the Raspberry Pi device, but has a lot
>> more I/O connectors going on, so it is interesting...
>> http://www.solid-run.com/products/cubox
>
> Chris,
>
> You're right in that it's more expensive than Raspberry Pi, but it does have
> a gigabit Ethernet port instead of 100 Mbit port.  It also has a
> TOSLINK/Optical S/PDIF output and more RAM.   It would make a great
> thin-client or even better XBMC box.

Absolutely correct.  You're getting quite a lot for the extra $100.

What would likely be "pretty killer" would be a device with either no
or minimal video, but *two* GigE ports, which could be turned into a
Mighty Powerful Mighty Small Router.
-- 
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list