"safe" android phone?

[aaron d]

Did you read the article? They have an update at the very top. It did play
out:

http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/1071

http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002133.html

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/31/samsung_keylogger_rumour_debunked/

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/samsung-keylogger-is-a-gfi-vipre-antivirus-false-positive/12128


That article is just a really weak piece of "journalism" to drive traffic.



On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Giles Orr <gilesorr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:

>
>
> Interesting reading for anyone considering Samsung products.
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/sec/2011/040411sec1.html
>
> It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20110331/6b8e85f5/attachment.html>