"safe" android phone?

[Giles Orr]

On 31 March 2011 11:03, aaron d <instantkamera-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Did you read the article? They have an update at the very top. It did play
> out:
> http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/1071
> http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002133.html
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/31/samsung_keylogger_rumour_debunked/
> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/samsung-keylogger-is-a-gfi-vipre-antivirus-false-positive/12128
>
> That article is just a really weak piece of "journalism" to drive traffic.
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Giles Orr <gilesorr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> Interesting reading for anyone considering Samsung products.
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/sec/2011/040411sec1.html
>>
>> It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.

Yes, I did read the article.  And the updates still said "under
investigation" when I last checked.  This, however, is more
conclusive:

https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/samsung-keylogger-case-turns-out-be-false-positive-033111

-- 
Giles
http://www.gilesorr.com/
gilesorr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists