Did you read the article? They have an update at the very top. It did play out:<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/1071">http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/1071</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002133.html">http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002133.html</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/31/samsung_keylogger_rumour_debunked/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/31/samsung_keylogger_rumour_debunked/</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/samsung-keylogger-is-a-gfi-vipre-antivirus-false-positive/12128">http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/samsung-keylogger-is-a-gfi-vipre-antivirus-false-positive/12128</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>That article is just a really weak piece of "journalism" to drive traffic.</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Giles Orr <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gilesorr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" target="_blank">gilesorr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><br>
<br>
</div>Interesting reading for anyone considering Samsung products.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/sec/2011/040411sec1.html" target="_blank">http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/sec/2011/040411sec1.html</a><br>
<br>
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.<br><font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div> </div></div>
</div>