small flash cards for low price?

Zbigniew Koziol softquake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sat Jun 27 15:47:28 UTC 2009


I believe we are talking about linucs here, or a something close, thats 
why I consider worth to continue on this subject...

D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> | From: Zbigniew Koziol <softquake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
>
> | Jamon Camisso wrote:
> | > Zbigniew Koziol wrote:
> | > > George Nicol wrote:
> | > > > I apologize. That was, indeed, bad form. Lame.
> | > > >
> | > > > Politely and sincerely: Please stop messing up our threaded
> | > > > conversations.
> | > >
> | > > I do the most obvious thing that one could do. I hit reply and change
> | > > subject. If this is causing problems than the software for archives does
> | > > not work properly. The mailing list itself does work properly.
> | >
> | > I disagree. You are not replying by starting a new thread. In fact, by
> | > hitting reply you are breaking things since RFC822 4.6.2 specifies that
> | > messages can contain an optional In-Reply-To field in their header. Since
> | > you are using Thunderbird and it adheres to the RFC (at least 4.6.2), the
> | > most obvious thing (for you) breaks things (for everyone else).
> | >
> | 
> | Then report the bug to Thunderbird.
> | 
> | Excuse me please.
>
> Zbigniew:
>
> Thunderbird is doing exactly what it should do.  You are using the
> reply command when in fact you are not replying.  Your new topic is
> not related to the message and yet you are declaring that it is.
>
> What you are doing is not the standard protocol and it is making
> things worse for other people.  In what way do you think what you are
> doing is appropriate and useful?
>
> You've been asked rudely and you've been asked nicely to conform to
> reasonable conventions.  Is there a reason not to do so?
>
> I'm sure we would excuse you if you could give an explanation that
> seemed reasonable.  The usual excuse ("I didn't know any better")
> appears not to apply, at least not any more.
>   
OK, "I didn't know any better". No, I in fact had no idea that the way I 
am posting to the list causes problems.

Am I a good boy now?
> Notice that I've changed the Subject (to fix your spelling) without 
> starting a new thread.  This is an example of how changing the Subject 
> does not change the thread.
>   
Thank you for fixing my spelling ;) Please continue doing that ;)

zb.

P.s.: Please excuse me in advance: It may happen yet that instead of 
typing ss.org in "To:" I will hit reply button and change the subject. 
This may cause third world war on this list and the list may 
disintegrate in flames. I am so, so... so much, awfully, really, from 
the deep of my heart, so much indeed that I can not spell that, so... 
sorrryyyyy!


> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>
>   

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list