small flash cards for low price?

[Rajinder Yadav]

Zb sounds like things are cool with email =)   .. My reply on the flash card was not an attack on your idea.

Nothing personal. Don't worry about spelling, I suffer from typos that make for funny reading! ...I account that to quantum flux in my brain where my ideas have not collapsed into a singularity until an observe reads my email ;)

Rajinder
Sent from my IPhone

On 27-Jun-09, at 11:47 AM, Zbigniew Koziol <softquake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:


I believe we are talking about linucs here, or a something close, thats why I consider worth to continue on this subject...

D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
| From: Zbigniew Koziol <softquake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>

| Jamon Camisso wrote:
| > Zbigniew Koziol wrote:
| > > George Nicol wrote:
| > > > I apologize. That was, indeed, bad form. Lame.
| > > >
| > > > Politely and sincerely: Please stop messing up our threaded
| > > > conversations.
| > >
| > > I do the most obvious thing that one could do. I hit reply and change
| > > subject. If this is causing problems than the software for archives does
| > > not work properly. The mailing list itself does work properly.
| >
| > I disagree. You are not replying by starting a new thread. In fact, by
| > hitting reply you are breaking things since RFC822 4.6.2 specifies that
| > messages can contain an optional In-Reply-To field in their header. Since
| > you are using Thunderbird and it adheres to the RFC (at least 4.6.2), the
| > most obvious thing (for you) breaks things (for everyone else).
| >
| | Then report the bug to Thunderbird.
| | Excuse me please.

Zbigniew:

Thunderbird is doing exactly what it should do.  You are using the
reply command when in fact you are not replying.  Your new topic is
not related to the message and yet you are declaring that it is.

What you are doing is not the standard protocol and it is making
things worse for other people.  In what way do you think what you are
doing is appropriate and useful?

You've been asked rudely and you've been asked nicely to conform to
reasonable conventions.  Is there a reason not to do so?

I'm sure we would excuse you if you could give an explanation that
seemed reasonable.  The usual excuse ("I didn't know any better")
appears not to apply, at least not any more.
 
OK, "I didn't know any better". No, I in fact had no idea that the way I am posting to the list causes problems.

Am I a good boy now?
Notice that I've changed the Subject (to fix your spelling) without starting a new thread.  This is an example of how changing the Subject does not change the thread.
 
Thank you for fixing my spelling ;) Please continue doing that ;)

zb.

P.s.: Please excuse me in advance: It may happen yet that instead of typing ss.org in "To:" I will hit reply button and change the subject. This may cause third world war on this list and the list may disintegrate in flames. I am so, so... so much, awfully, really, from the deep of my heart, so much indeed that I can not spell that, so.... sorrryyyyy!


--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists

 

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists



      __________________________________________________________________
The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier.  Optimized for Yahoo!  Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists