OT: Buying an iPod in Toronto: recommendations please
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Tue Nov 20 20:28:58 UTC 2007
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 02:20:13PM -0500, Jamon Camisso wrote:
> Unless you've spent $500+ on a good set of cans, or $1000+ on speakers,
> and more on an amp, I challenge anyone to discern the difference
> between an mp3 at 192kbps, or an ogg at q7.
Depends on the material and who is doing the listening. But yes it
would probably require decent headphones/speakers to tell.
> I recall someone on a list arguing that they could tell the difference
> between an uncompressed flac and the original wav file, even though the
> md5sum of both was identical.
Unrelated really, and just plain stupid. Which part of lossless did
they not understand? Did they think using zip on the wave file made a
difference too?
> What I'm saying I guess, is that for the most part, it's all in people's
> heads...
Often yes, but not always. Certainly the quality of the speakers and
amplifier probably matter a lot more than that mp3/aac/whatever. On the
other hand 64kbps MP3 will probably sound bad no matter what.
--
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list