OT: non-commercial open source license?
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Wed Jan 4 22:05:54 UTC 2006
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:45:36PM -0500, G. Matthew Rice wrote:
> I don't think that the word 'reasonable' is used ;)
>
> Also, if you have a derived work or just use some GPL'ed code in your
> product, you can also charge whatever you like.
>
> Just look at the various distro prices. Almost identical software but prices
> range from free to $1000s.
That often includes tech support and other services.
> No. You have to make the new code available to anyone that gets the
> 'product'. Of course, it's easier to just make it downloadable but you don't
> have to.
>
> If the code never leaves your biz, you have no obligations to spread it
> around.
>
> No. I don't think so. It is polite to rename it or indicate that it is
> different, though.
Agreed.
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list