GNU FDL License vs. Creative Commons

[Daniel Armstrong]

On 4/14/06, Sy Ali <sy1234-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> And so because I don't particularly care, I went for the more
> accessible license which I could easily understand.  I was also lazy
> and didn't want to persue Gnu stuff because there's a lot of politics
> and anger over there, which I don't want to associate with.
>

Thanks for the feedback. The Creative Commons License does seem a lot
more straightforward, and using the non-commercial clause (with a
laissez-faire attitude towards granting permission) as a form of
notification of what others might want to do with the work is a good
idea.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml