One of those monumental days ........
Chris F.A. Johnson
cfaj-uVmiyxGBW52XDw4h08c5KA at public.gmane.org
Wed Nov 9 21:45:02 UTC 2005
yOn Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:57:06PM -0500, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>> yOn Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:06:31AM -0500, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>>>> If zsh were a POSIX shell, I'd probably use it.
>>> It isn't?
>>> Is bash?
> So what in zsh makes it not posix, and makes bash posix?
Compliance (or lack of) with the POSIX standard.
> I have seen shell scripts that were supposed to be posix shell
> scripts fail on bash3 while working on bash2 and other posix
> compliant shells.
Then they were not POSIX scripts. Do you have examples?
> Never did try those scripts on zsh.
While writing my book, I (or rather, the technical reviewer,
William Park) found many examples of POSIX scripts that did not
work on zsh.
> I always thought of zsh as a superset of bash and bash as a superset of
According to its man page, zsh tries to emulate sh or ksh if it
is invoked as sh. There is no mention of POSIX; ksh is the basis
for, but is not entirely, POSIX, the degree of compliance
depending on the version.
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach, 2005, Apress
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy