One of those monumental days ........

Lennart Sorensen lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Thu Nov 10 14:46:51 UTC 2005


On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:45:02PM -0500, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
>      Then they were not POSIX scripts. Do you have examples?

I don't remember where I found it anymore.  Just seemed weird that it
worked with bash 2.x, but broke on bash 3.x (I think the problem was
using a command in the script that bash 3.x had a builtin for that used
different syntax than the linux command did).

>      While writing my book, I (or rather, the technical reviewer,
>      William Park) found many examples of POSIX scripts that did not
>      work on zsh.

Even when invoked as sh?  i guess it is more aimed at being a great
interactive shell.

>      According to its man page, zsh tries to emulate sh or ksh if it
>      is invoked as sh. There is no mention of POSIX; ksh is the basis
>      for, but is not entirely, POSIX, the degree of compliance
>      depending on the version.

The man page mentions posix standards many times.  I know it doesn't
really try to be just a plain shell, so I can believe by default it is
anything but a posix shell.

Lennart Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml





More information about the Legacy mailing list