Ximian Evolution question

[Kareem Shehata]

On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 13:19, Lloyd D Budd wrote:
> The developer's of evo are the 1st to admit that it's IMAP client
> implementation is lacking.  Improving it does not seem to be a priority.
> 
> For many it is good enough, but for some (seems dependent on IMAP server
> software and volume of email) it makes evo unusable -- supposedly kmail
> has a good implementation.  Check the Ximian Evolution List
> <evolution-YszlSufgerXQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> for more details.

Thanks for the tip Lloyd.  I'd noticed some oddness with evolution's
imap, but nothing major (the small font problem's been the worst so
far).  How are the KOffice tools at handling the rest of Evolutions
functionality, e.g. schedule and contacts, synchronization to a palm
etc.?

Kareem

-- 
/*********************************************************************
      kareem-d+8TeBu5bOew5LPnMra/2Q at public.gmane.org   -   Kareem Shehata   -   416-676-6611     
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
  We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act,
  but a habit.
    -- Aristotle
 ********************************************************************/

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml