[GTALUG] OT: Re: TLDs

ac ac at main.me
Thu Jul 25 09:41:28 EDT 2024


On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 08:45:15 -0400
Giles Orr via talk <talk at gtalug.org> wrote:
> This isn't directly Linux-related, but it's a topic that's probably of
> interest to many on this list.
> https://tld-list.com/tlds-from-a-z
> That shows a list of all top-level domain names - which is interesting
> enough.  But if you click on any given TLD, it shows you who owns it,
> the intended purpose, and the pricing ... not just the registration
> price and the renewal price now, but over time.  Being as fascinated
> by this as I am requires a combination of a couple different geeky
> inclinations.  I own several domains and also have often registered
> them for my work - but I'm also fascinated by words and ideas, and by
> the demand for them (here translated into dollar values for domain
> names).
> For example: .black and .green are apparently "cool" colours, because
> their registration cost is in the $50-$60 range.  Other colours aren't
> as cool - eg. .pink which sells for ~$15.  And some colours (eg.
> .yellow) don't exist at all.  I guess no one thought they could make
> money off that domain.
> 
it is all about someone actually doing the marketing and work, with
enough marketing anything can become valuable and even useful.
even .pink although... .pinky would have been cooler! brain.pinky would
be my registration :)

> And this is before we get into the incredible and absurd diversity of
> domain names.  .ninja anyone?  (Its registration price is very low,
> but renewal costs more.)  I could of course register gilesorr.recipes
> for all that cooking blogging that I do ...
> 
hahahaha, will not help you... your content will be stolen, re-worked
and then your own original content will be flagged as duplicate and
even ai generated, even if your recipe(s) were created by you from
scratch and the abusive power will simply index gilesorr.recipes as
low value rubbish

> I'm curious: what's your pick for weirdest TLD?  What's the strangest
> one you've actually seen in use?
> 
strange is a matter of perspective and policy and sometimes truth is
way way stranger than fiction. (and also very much directly related to
language and culture)

for myself, something unthinkable and very bad to just utter would be
the word: machimba. 

For most of you this word does not even hold any meaning. for
Spanish speakers it may simply be a word that refers to fruit. In some
regions of Africa it may also be your neighbors last name :)

so, at the writing of this drivel, there also is no machimba.com even...
and it seems to exist only in one sub tld space

but if I were to say or type something which you would choose to take
offense at, this would be an entirely different case and you would
'feel' offended or may choose to become offended, for example:
to native english speakers merde is not so bad as the word shit (and
vice versa, of course.

in my fav TLD, .me for example: balls.me is apparently very cool 
and cunts.me seems to be okay also similar to dick.me - but fuck.me is
simply not allowed as that is offensive.

Andre


More information about the talk mailing list