[GTALUG] which fits in better with Gnome3 -- MATE or Cinnamon?
D. Hugh Redelmeier
hugh at mimosa.com
Sat Dec 16 11:10:47 EST 2017
[Second try at posting this to the list.]
In my world (mostly Fedora), the normal desktop is Gnome3, including its
shell.
Sometimes people ask me for a good old desktop, and I know the answer must
be MATE or Cinnamon.
Originally MATE was a fork of GNOME 2 and so I assumed that it would
conflict with an already-installed Gnome 3 in some ways.
Since Cinnamon was a fork of Gnome 3, I similarly assumed it would
co-exist well with Gnome 3.
I'm not sure of that any longer after reading the wikipedia pages.
Some criteria for co-existance:
- (pretty basic) can both be installed at one time. So no make conflicts.
- (asperational) installed GNOME applications can run under the other
shell
- (asperational) installed applications for the other environment can run
under the GNOME Shell
Most comparisons are old. Here's a recent one, but it doesn't seem
that useful:
<https://www.slant.co/versus/1123/1125/~mate_vs_cinnamon>
More information about the talk
mailing list