CDE Unix desktop open sourced
Christopher Browne
cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Sun Aug 12 14:22:25 UTC 2012
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ben Walton <bdwalton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I still remember thinking cde was a klunky user experience even when
> stacked against really early kde releases...
>
> We used to build kde for our sparc stations to avoid using cde. :)
My favorite part is that people might want CDE for
"use in some lightweight distributions."
At the time...
a) CDE and Motif were considered horribly heavyweight;
b) One of the points of using a "DE" was supposed to be that since
widgets and services would be widely reused, they ought to be lighter
weight than their alternatives.
Unfortunately, things went down a counter-Unix-Philosophy trail, where
things became less scriptable, and everything got statically compiled
into everything, to a fault. (Sure, there are dynamic libraries, but
if you want to install a newer app, you need new dynamic libraries, so
they might as well be statically linked, and you have the worst of
worlds...)
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list