Stupid RAID question
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Tue Oct 4 21:35:30 UTC 2011
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 09:36:17PM -0400, James Knott wrote:
> I recently set up a RAID array at work and a while ago at home. I
> have /boot on non RAID, but apparently it can be on RAID1. On the
> work server, I used a 2 GB slice of the 1st drive for /boot and used
> the 2 GB slices on the other 3 drives for swap. I used the rest of
> the drive space for RAID5 I then put LVM on top of the RAID array.
Just remember that if your swap is NOT on raid, then a drive failure
crashes the system and corrupts data.
I don't know why so many people can't understand that basic concept.
raid 0 is NOT something you use for swap. It is only something to use
for unimportant temporary data that you don't need to keep.
--
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list