Anyone tried Bell's Fibe TV?

john.moniz-rieW9WUcm8FFJ04o6PK0Fg at public.gmane.org john.moniz-rieW9WUcm8FFJ04o6PK0Fg at public.gmane.org
Mon May 16 01:06:17 UTC 2011


> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:30:32 -0400
> From: jamon.camisso-H217xnMUJC0sA/PxXw9srA at public.gmane.org
> To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Anyone tried Bell's Fibe TV?
> 
> On 05/15/2011 03:18 PM, Dave Mason wrote:
> > 
> > On May 13, 2011, at 14:22, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> > 
> >> If Bell offers FTTN to you, the CRTC has ruled that the 3rd party ISPs
> >> must be allowed to do so too.  I don't know
> >> 1) whether Bell has complied with this ruling
> >> 2) Teksavvy is willing to offer it to you
> > 
> > I've been asking Teksavvy when, and they've been very non-commital.  My current Teksavvy service is substandard.  I'm honestly thinking of switching to Bell (even though they are probably partly responsible for my Teksavvy problems, and more-importantly to me, they don't seem to do fixed-IP).  My down-speed is reasonable, but my up speed is typically 1/4 of what's promised.
> > 
> >> I seem to remember that the CRTC ruling allowed Bell to charge Teksavy
> >> 10% more for FTTN service.
> > 
> > I'd happily pay a premium to get faster service.
> 
> If you can get cable from them, you won't regret it. Price is almost the
> same as DSL, with no Bell shenanigans.

So instead you get Rogers shenanigans?
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20110516/364f3dc1/attachment.html>


More information about the Legacy mailing list