<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:30:32 -0400<br>> From: jamon.camisso@utoronto.ca<br>> To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4@public.gmane.org<br>> Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Anyone tried Bell's Fibe TV?<br>> <br>> On 05/15/2011 03:18 PM, Dave Mason wrote:<br>> > <br>> > On May 13, 2011, at 14:22, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:<br>> > <br>> >> If Bell offers FTTN to you, the CRTC has ruled that the 3rd party ISPs<br>> >> must be allowed to do so too. I don't know<br>> >> 1) whether Bell has complied with this ruling<br>> >> 2) Teksavvy is willing to offer it to you<br>> > <br>> > I've been asking Teksavvy when, and they've been very non-commital. My current Teksavvy service is substandard. I'm honestly thinking of switching to Bell (even though they are probably partly responsible for my Teksavvy problems, and more-importantly to me, they don't seem to do fixed-IP). My down-speed is reasonable, but my up speed is typically 1/4 of what's promised.<br>> > <br>> >> I seem to remember that the CRTC ruling allowed Bell to charge Teksavy<br>> >> 10% more for FTTN service.<br>> > <br>> > I'd happily pay a premium to get faster service.<br>> <br>> If you can get cable from them, you won't regret it. Price is almost the<br>> same as DSL, with no Bell shenanigans.<br><br>So instead you get Rogers shenanigans?<br> </body>
</html>