Website Stats

[Jason Shaw]

You are correct.  I was too quick in eyeballing that sum.

Move along, nothing to see here :)

-jason

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:32 PM, <sciguy-Ja3L+HSX0kI at public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Sorry to say: 459 + 943 = 1402, not 1302. Google is likely doing something
> entirely unrelated to the other two analyzers. I would have conjectured
> like you that if they really did add up, a relationship of some kind would
> have existed.
>
> Paul King
>
> > My guess is that they each define "visitors" in a different manner.
> Notice
> > that Google's number is the sum of the other two.  I'd read the manual
> and
> > see how they define visitors to see where the discrepancy lies instead of
> > adding another analyzer, and thus another different number.
> >
> > -jason
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Jason Carson <jason-HjkH5KTEMfuEjziKL+yzSg at public.gmane.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> I am monitoring my web stats with 3 different analyzers but they all
> >> report different results. As an example here are the number of visits
> >> reported by each...
> >>
> >> Webalizer - 459 visits
> >> AWStats - 943 visits
> >> Google Analytics - 1302 visits.
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone know which would be the most accurate or should I try another web
> >> stat analyzer?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> >> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> >> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20110501/ad89fa5a/attachment.html>