Website Stats

[sciguy-Lmt0BfyYGMw at public.gmane.org]

Sorry to say: 459 + 943 = 1402, not 1302. Google is likely doing something
entirely unrelated to the other two analyzers. I would have conjectured
like you that if they really did add up, a relationship of some kind would
have existed.

Paul King

> My guess is that they each define "visitors" in a different manner. Notice
> that Google's number is the sum of the other two.  I'd read the manual and
> see how they define visitors to see where the discrepancy lies instead of
> adding another analyzer, and thus another different number.
>
> -jason
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Jason Carson <jason-HjkH5KTEMfuEjziKL+yzSg at public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am monitoring my web stats with 3 different analyzers but they all
>> report different results. As an example here are the number of visits
>> reported by each...
>>
>> Webalizer - 459 visits
>> AWStats - 943 visits
>> Google Analytics - 1302 visits.
>>
>>
>> Anyone know which would be the most accurate or should I try another web
>> stat analyzer?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --
>> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
>> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
>> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>>
>


--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists