SATA problem
D. Hugh Redelmeier
hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org
Tue Mar 22 06:58:05 UTC 2011
| From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
| I was wanting to add a couple extra drives to one of my systems, and
| apparently picked up the wrong sort of SATA controller. Docs out on
| the "interweb" are a bit less up to date than seems useful.
What documentation did you use?
I've heard, but I don't know from where, to avoid VIA. Maybe Lennart.
Maybe that was about firewire.
Here's a useful resource:
<https://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/SATA_hardware_features>
But maybe that is what you found to be out of date.
Decent SATA controllers use PCIe because PCI isn't fast enough.
Cheap PCI controllers are usually 150 MB/s, not "SATA 2.0".
Sata I / 150 MB/s is probably fine for most applications
There are features you may want. These may include:
- Port Multiplier support (yesterday I wanted to buy a cheap JBOD box for my
Acer Revo but found that the ION SATA controller doesn't support
Port Multiplication)
- hot plugging
- AHCI
- eSATA
What I've used on a PCI bus were inexpensive cards based on Silicon
Image chips.
- one was from Canada Computers (actually XpressCanada.com, their slightly
cheaper mail-order arm):
<http://canadacomputers.com/product_info.php?cPath=19_252_254&item_id=008587>
- One was from NewEgg (now out of stock)
<http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816132007>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list