Dumb bind question

Madison Kelly linux-5ZoueyuiTZhBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Fri Sep 25 16:47:20 UTC 2009


S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Madison Kelly wrote:
>> alteeve.com             IN SOA ns1.alteeve.com. admin.nouvelocity.com. (
>>                                2009092201      ;       Serial Number 
>> (yyyymmdd##)
> 
> If you see the current SOA:
> 
> $ host -t soa alteeve.com
> alteeve.com has SOA record ns1.alteeve.com. admin.nouvelocity.com. 
> 2009092202 10800 3600 86400 38400
> 
> ... the domain alteeve.com currently has a SOA which is newer (larger 
> serial number) than the one you quoted. So it seems you did change in 
> the past with this larger serial number. If you introduce another update 
> with smaller serial number, this update will not be considered, you need 
> to use serial number larger than existing one.
> 

Indeed you are right, and that was an old copy (hence the type), but the 
NS section's syntax was the same.

Madi

--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list