Dumb bind question
Madison Kelly
linux-5ZoueyuiTZhBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Fri Sep 25 16:47:20 UTC 2009
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Madison Kelly wrote:
>> alteeve.com IN SOA ns1.alteeve.com. admin.nouvelocity.com. (
>> 2009092201 ; Serial Number
>> (yyyymmdd##)
>
> If you see the current SOA:
>
> $ host -t soa alteeve.com
> alteeve.com has SOA record ns1.alteeve.com. admin.nouvelocity.com.
> 2009092202 10800 3600 86400 38400
>
> ... the domain alteeve.com currently has a SOA which is newer (larger
> serial number) than the one you quoted. So it seems you did change in
> the past with this larger serial number. If you introduce another update
> with smaller serial number, this update will not be considered, you need
> to use serial number larger than existing one.
>
Indeed you are right, and that was an old copy (hence the type), but the
NS section's syntax was the same.
Madi
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list