Comments on another CRTC draft submission
Walter Dnes
waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org
Tue Mar 10 01:54:23 UTC 2009
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:46:27PM -0400, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote
> | I consulted Bell's web page on the evening of March
> | 4, 2008, to check their rates.
>
> I bet that was this year, not last year.
Oops. Thanks. That's exactly the type of stuff I was hoping people
would find. It's corrected now.
> | 1) Commission-approved, transparent, and equitable network management
> | 2) Outside of item 1), no blocking/slowing of traffic, except where
> | required by Canadian federal legislation or an order by a court of
> | competent jurisdiction
>
> Actually, one threat is subtly different: speeding up preferred
> traffic. Is that different from slowing other traffic? (You and I
> would say yes, but proponents would try to argue the opposite.)
>
> And yet, forbidding speeding up traffic would seem to prevent good
> engineering practice such as caches.
I'll have to look at including that in condition 1, maybe like...
1) Commission-approved, transparent, and equitable network management,
including neutral and non-invasive caching of frequently-visited sites
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes-SLHPyeZ9y/tg9hUCZPvPmw at public.gmane.org>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list