scary things at CRTC
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org
Mon Apr 20 17:49:42 UTC 2009
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:49:27AM -0400, Robert Brockway wrote:
> During my science education I was taught to be constantly on guard
> against scientific dogma.
>
> Scientists are human and don't always act purely in accordance with the
> scientific method.
>
> Many scientists have become defensive when their life's work (and perhaps
> their reputation and livlihood) has been threated by new discoveries.
>
> Many of them have clung beyond all reason to the work of their youth
> instead of accepting there were major flaws in their theories. They make
> up more and more elaborate theories to account for the apparent
> discrepances between their earlier work and reality. They assume their
> work explains reality even when there is evidence to the contrart. This
> is faith.
>
> Science is replete with examples of scientific dogma, where large numbers
> of scientists have ignored the evidence and clung to older theories that
> looked more and more tenous as time went on. In the end this resistance
> usually only went away when the old guard died off.
>
> Plate Techtonics is a great example. The evidence that continents moved
> and changed over time was very strong and came from a variety of sources,
> and yet the geological establishment resisted the idea of decades.
>
> Ideas like an expanding universe were resisted heavily by astronomers (in
> the early 20th century) who had built their life's work on the assumption
> that the universe was largely static over time. The proponents were even
> happy to suggest that the universe was violating conservation of
> mass-energy to keep their theory afloat.
>
> Science has also been tainted all too often by cultural prejudices.
> Scientists well into the 20th century were presenting serious scientific
> studies that draw conclusions about sexuality or ethnicity that many of
> us would find abhorent.
>
> The idea that science is always pure and somehow naturally avoids
> scientific dogma is itself a form of dogma.
The failure of some scientists does not imply a failure of science.
Clearly some scientists were making discoveries and pointing out the
failures in the existing theories.
--
Len Sorensen
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list