OT: Rogers and Home-based Business Networks?

Marc Lanctot lanctot-yfeSBMgouQgsA/PxXw9srA at public.gmane.org
Tue Apr 14 17:38:21 UTC 2009


On 14/04/09 12:47 PM, Jamon Camisso wrote:

> What are you planning? If you're going to be using a lot of CPU e.g.
> database related activity, it really makes sense to spend the extra
> money for a dedicated db machine.

What I'm planning to do is not exactly a secret but I want to unveil it 
properly once it's ready for a beta stage. I've got an unstable base at 
the moment. If you have lots of time and you're really curious, I have 
posted about the idea on TLUG before. :)

I'd love the dedicated machines. At the moment it might not be feasible 
for me given my budget, but it might be a good way to release the thing 
initially. Once (if) it gets popular, I will find or collect the money 
to push it to a proper setup.

>> So my concern is if I only get a percentage of the CPU. Say there are
>> 10 other OS's on my virtual machine. Will my processes ever be allowed
>> to get more than 1/10th of the CPU power? If so, let's say my
>> processes are hogs and take up 80% of the physical machine's CPU at
>> all times.. will this ever be a problem?
>
> Most companies will offer a semi dedicated option where you share a host
> with a few other customers e.g. as many as there are CPUs. That way each
> gets at least a single dedicated core. With octal core machines, my
> company have 8 customers on a machine with 16gb (or more memory).

How much? Give me a link to the site.

> They use Xen as do many virtualization providers (who provide customers
> with full root access anyways). The overhead is low, community and
> support is great, and it allows for static resource allocation like set
> memory and cpu caps. Some companies advertise 2048mb of memory and lots
> of resources, only you'll find that those are burstable amounts and not
> guaranteed e.g. what happens if two guests both get hit with lots of
> traffic and fight each other for burst memory?
>
> Like Robert said, there is a ton of information out there about
> virtualization, but I highly recommend going with a company (like mine
> ;) that uses Xen.

Luckily memory won't be much of an issue. I'm so strapped for cash right 
now (thanks to everyone who's sending me emails about hosting) that it 
has to be the deciding factor. If once my "product" goes beta and gets 
popular and /actually needs the better hardware/, I will consider going 
to a more expensive solution and will, of course, encourage the 
companies that TLUGgers work for or recommend before any others.

Marc

-- 
Imagination is more important than knowledge.
   -- Albert Einstein
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists





More information about the Legacy mailing list