Debian Lenny and release dates
John Moniz
john.moniz-rieW9WUcm8FFJ04o6PK0Fg at public.gmane.org
Wed Oct 15 15:05:17 UTC 2008
I have a fairly old Debian stable release on my home file server (either
Woody or the one before). Can I still do a dist-upgrade? And what would
that get me, the next release up from the one I have or would I end up
with the latest stable release?
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 02:20:23AM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
>
>> Saw this article just now:
>>
>> http://www.tectonic.co.za/?p=3312
>>
>> Not really concerned that 'Debian is in trouble', but I am curious about how
>> the releases work.
>>
>
> Once in a while, debian manages to get the critical bug count very low,
> and any remaining packages with bugs that are not that important are
> kicked out of the release. Then the release is declared stable, and the
> previous stable release is named old-stable. A new testing release (The
> next one I believe is to be named Squeeze or something like that) is
> then named based on the new stable release. Lots of tested packages
> without known bugs in unstable are then let in to testing, and
> development continues for a few more years until once again a stable
> release happens. In the past there was no testing, and the elimination
> of bugs had to happen in unstable until it was in a state that could be
> released. That was hard and painful and held up new development. I
> think testing started after the release of 2.2.
>
>
>> If I am running Lenny, and want to maintain a system that always has relatively
>> up to date software (not necessarily bleeding edge), what is the process to
>> follow when Lenny finally is finally released? Is that a 'dist-upgrade', or is
>> that only for going, say, from Lenny to Sid?
>>
>
> dist-upgrade is the only proper way to ever upgrade. The upgrade option
> is pretty much useless as it refuses to install anything new or remove
> anything old, which during development is often necesary. The only
> place plain upgrade tends to work is getting security updates on a
> stable release.
>
> Oh and going to Sid should only be done by those that know what they are
> doing, since Sid is the unstable development branch. Sid is never going
> to be a stable release. After all Sid was the kid in Toy Story that
> tortured and broke all the toys.
>
>
>> Sorry if I sound thick, but I've been doing clean installs of Mandriva releases
>> every year or so for a long time, having trouble wrapping my head around this
>> new scheme.
>>
>
> New scheme? It's been going on this way for well over a decade.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
More information about the Legacy
mailing list