i thought this was illegal?

[Christopher Browne]

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:05 PM, ted leslie <tleslie-RBVUpeUoHUc at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>  even though MS is far from a monoploy now,
>  they do still have all the $$$$ they made from their monopoly days.
>  but i thought that taking a product and "dumping" it just to whipout
>  a competitor was highly illegal, and I am not sure i can see
>  (unlike most of MS crimes) a convient excuse for this one, other then
>  to stop linux? in other words how would they defend this in court?
>  how can they justify this pricing model?

Traditionally, "dumping" is considered to require setting a price that
is lower than the cost of the product.

Software turns out to be a mighty strange sort of product, in that the
"cost" can legitimately be considered to be the cost of distributing
copies, which, as it turns out, is remarkably low.

For instance, I can buy DVDs for ~$0.25 apiece, so that the cost of
distributing software might be as low as 4 cents per gigabyte.

I don't think Microsoft is trying to sell XP for prices *that* low.

I think they may be acting in a predatory fashion (well, when *don't*
they? :-)), but this doesn't seem like dumping, to me, and it doesn't
seem as though it is likely to contravene laws.

The fact that it may offend you does not establish any legal context
to consider it Actually Against The Law...
-- 
http://linuxfinances.info/info/linuxdistributions.html
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and
expecting different results." -- assortedly attributed to Albert
Einstein, Benjamin Franklin, Rita Mae Brown, and Rudyard Kipling
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists