i thought this was illegal?

[ted leslie]

no no no bill said remember the browser need to be a integral part of the desktop,
and therefore MS had now choice ... oh time has shown that (no kidding) was pure BS,
look at the % of MS users using FireFox.

-tl

On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:01:53 -0400
Stephen <stephen-d-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org> wrote:

> ted leslie wrote:
> > even though MS is far from a monoploy now,
> > they do still have all the $$$$ they made from their monopoly days.
> > but i thought that taking a product and "dumping" it just to whipout
> > a competitor was highly illegal, and I am not sure i can see
> > (unlike most of MS crimes) a convient excuse for this one, other then 
> > to stop linux? in other words how would they defend this in court?
> > how can they justify this pricing model?
> >   
> There is a precedent:
> 
> Netscape Browser
> 
> Stephen
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
> 


-- 
ted leslie <tleslie-RBVUpeUoHUc at public.gmane.org>
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists