Linux may lose its chance of competing with Microsoft after the 64bit revolution gets underway
Evan Leibovitch
evan-ieNeDk6JonTYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org
Fri Sep 1 02:17:08 UTC 2006
paul sutton wrote:
> I agree with this, why are we obsessed with the desktop,
On the contrary, Linux to date has been "obsessed" with the server. It
is only recently, within the last few years, that the Linux desktop has
been mentioned at all as more than just a pretty UI for server admins
and power users.
Those of use who are old enough to remember the glory days of Linux
recall that it was the lack of a credible desktop version that allowed
Windows to encroach on its server territory. If your operation was going
to be all-Windows or Windows/Unix, the logic went, wouldn't it be easier
just to get both sides from one source? The story was compelling,
especially to the small business sector that gleefully traded in its
Unix-based Foxpros and Business Basics and Wyse 60s for Visual Basic and
Access and talking paper clips.
There is a lesson to be learned -- while I'm not amongst those who say
Linux is a failure if it doesn't display Windows everywhere, I do
believe that a credible desktop offering is very important to those
advocates and vendors who need to demonstrate an corporate-quality
end-to-end FOSS solution without needing to fall back on MS somewhere in
the chain.
IMO, credible does not mean that it needs to be as slick as the Mac or
have as many third-party apps as MS-Windows. It just needs to be
reasonably functional and easy to use by non-geeks. Things have come a
very long way but there are still gaps that are fixable and can't be
totally blamed on licensing issues (ie, better PDA connectivity, better
interoperability between GNOME and KDE apps).
As has been mentioned elsewhere, the client platform is not as
monolythic as it used to be. Joining the traditional networked PCs are
thin clients, PDAs, smartphones, networked game machines, the OLPC
project, etc... and Linux has a growing presence here that shines as a
flexible, extensible platform. Windows can continue to dominate the PC
thick-client platform while seeing its share of the total client
population plummet.
If anything, Linux is unquestionably the current leader in scalability
and end-to-end interoperability. It runs supercomputers and
wristwatches. It arguably gave new life to the IBM mainframe product and
powers millions of phones in Asia.
In any case, Linux is doing quite well for itself in powering the
servers that will give all those new clients something to do.
A good desktop is a Really Nice Thing to have, but our world won't be
made or broken based on whether your Fedora box can play Shockwave
animations or do Pantone colour matching.
- Evan
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list