X and Eye Candy

D. Hugh Redelmeier hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org
Tue Mar 14 22:06:42 UTC 2006


| From: Tim Writer <tim-s/rLXaiAEBtBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org>
| 
| Evan Leibovitch <evan-ieNeDk6JonTYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org> writes:
| 
| > Release 0.1 doesn't support DRI but future versions will aim at
| > supporting it.
| 
| Are you sure about that? ATI's proprietary driver requires DRI for hardware
| accelerated OpenGL. Without DRI, 3D rendering is software only. In which
| case, why wouldn't it (Xgl) work with any video card, assuming the system is
| fast enough to provide reasonable 3D performance?

As I understand it, Xgl is an X server built on top of another X
server.  Xgl does not provide DRI to its clients, but it uses DRI as a
client of the other server.

It isn't obvious to me that there is a way for Xgl to provide DRI to
its client.  I just don't know if the DRI from one level can be made
to look like DRI at another.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml





More information about the Legacy mailing list