O.T. c64 slow drives. was
Sy Ali
sy1234-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org
Fri Jul 14 21:23:54 UTC 2006
On 7/13/06, Lance F. Squire <lance-5ZoueyuiTZhBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> The 'inside' story to this slowness is quite interesting.
>
> First, the 1541 started as a Vic 20 drive, and was acceptably fast.
>
> Apparently, a timing error in the 64 roms caused the reads to miss the
> next sector. This caused the system to have to wait for the sector to
> come around again.
>
> As this was slower than running the drives in 'slow' mode. They just
> shipped the 64 coloured drives with 'slow' mode set as default, rather
> than tossing the burnt roms and fixing.
This explains why the replacement ROMs were so spectacular. Replace
the chip in the drive and use an equivalent in the system. I can't
remember the name of the chip though.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list