O.T. c64 slow drives. was
Lance F. Squire
lance-5ZoueyuiTZhBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Thu Jul 13 17:50:12 UTC 2006
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:13:46PM -0400, phiscock-g851W1bGYuGnS0EtXVNi6w at public.gmane.org wrote:
>
>>This puts me in mind of the Commodore 64 floppy disk drive. To save money,
>>Commodore had the same processor reading the drive mech as talking to the
>>IEEE bus. As someone said:
>>
>>'Loads programs faster than you can type them in!!! (But only just..)'
>
The 'inside' story to this slowness is quite interesting.
First, the 1541 started as a Vic 20 drive, and was acceptably fast.
Apparently, a timing error in the 64 roms caused the reads to miss the
next sector. This caused the system to have to wait for the sector to
come around again.
As this was slower than running the drives in 'slow' mode. They just
shipped the 64 coloured drives with 'slow' mode set as default, rather
than tossing the burnt roms and fixing.
That and the 'bash the head against the stop' till you were sure it was
homed, were 'Brilliant'...
Most drives used a micro switch or other device to know when the head
reached 'home' position.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list