Will certified e-mail stop spam? (was: unsubscribing... etc)
Peter
plp-ysDPMY98cNQDDBjDh4tngg at public.gmane.org
Thu Apr 13 18:01:41 UTC 2006
> Let me start by saying that I haven't been actively following this thread so I
> may be very misinformed, but you're last paragraph really struct a chord with
> me, particularly this sentence: "This would prod 'innocent ignorers' into
> action." Now, I don't know if you are talking about charging business servers,
> who should be taking appropriate action to ensure they're not part of the
> problem or actual home users (Mom and Pop), but I'm under the impression that
> it is the latter. THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN. I can just imagine the outrage of
> people who are already frustrated by computers having to pay an additional
> charge to be on the internet when, I think, a lot of these people are on the
> internet only because they feel they have to be. They are already upset about
> paying for something they don't fully understand.
Anybody who sends email that gets returned as spam, beyond a certain
small quota that takes care of temporary misconfigurations, should be
charged in escrow, by his own ISP. If the email is not returned as spam,
say within a week, the fee is waived. Mailing lists request and receive
special permission. Anybody who sends spam using that ISP pays through
the nose. Anybody whose computer was zombied gets a scary bill and the
alternative of terminating the account or immediately sanitizing the
computer and maybe paying a reduced fee for the inconvenience caused.
The ISPs will be only too glad to oblige. Any spammer on their network
would be charged to the tune of $20,000 per month. This would be good,
because other ISPs who would receive the spam could sue them, and they
would need the money for legal costs...
Peter
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list