Mandrake 9.1 kernel update problems
Fraser Campbell
fraser-Txk5XLRqZ6CsTnJN9+BGXg at public.gmane.org
Sun Jan 11 20:26:13 UTC 2004
On January 11, 2004 02:13 pm, Austin Acton wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 14:07, Clive DaSilva wrote:
> > Since then I have tried to upgrade my kernel twice since then,
> > first to 2.4.21.0.27 mdk and also to 2.6.0.1mdk. In both cases, the
> > urpmi tool as well as "rpm --checksig kernelwhatever.rpm" reported a
> > "bad signature" and borked the installation.
>
> Don't confuse "bad signature" with "bad checksum".
> The latter means the rpm is broken, but the former just means that you
> don't have the Mandrake 9.1 pgp key in your rpm database.
It could also mean that the ftp site has been hacked and that someone has
replaced the kernel rpm with one that has some nice added features. Is it
common for Mandrake rpms to have bad signatures?
--
Fraser Campbell <fraser-Txk5XLRqZ6CsTnJN9+BGXg at public.gmane.org> http://www.wehave.net/
Georgetown, Ontario, Canada Debian GNU/Linux
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list