[OT-mask]
Gregory D Hough
mr6re9-mI4xJ4qlgtBiLUuM0BA3LQ at public.gmane.org
Tue Feb 24 12:28:20 UTC 2004
Greetings,
I labelled this OT but it may be right on. An interesting phenomenon
occurs when a Linux admin wannabe notices a winbox was compromised
within a NATwork and replaces it a different flavor of winnibblets. I'm
no astronaut, but this re-entry has been quite a ride.
Bad guys often wear masks to hide their true identity. "I believe" the
same is true with badguysonline. So my question is when if ever should
there appear a 255 octet in a host address, and is it wise to do
anything but DROP these?
As I understand it, a packet sent to 192.168.1.255 will be seen by all
hosts on the 192.168.1.0. As I understand it, 192.168.0.0/16 is non-
routeable on the internet along with a few other reserved network
blocks. I'd like to learn how this pertains to the wide area network.
Here is just one example:
68.95.134.255 resolves to:
adsl-68-95-134-255.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net
thanks,
farmer6re9
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list