Strategies after buying new hard drive
Andrew Hammond
ahammond-swQf4SbcV9C7WVzo/KQ3Mw at public.gmane.org
Sat Dec 11 22:52:12 UTC 2004
cbbrowne-HInyCGIudOg at public.gmane.org wrote:
>>>So, if you have a 4 GB drive and some spanky new drive, then one idea
>>>you might consider is putting swap, /tmp, on the 4 GB, and have the more
>>>bulky occasional stuff on the other disk. It all depends on what you're
>>>trying to do with this system.
>>>
>>>
>>And how slow would that make /tmp and swap? 4GB drives are terribly
>>slow by todays drive speeds.
>>
>>
>
>Indeed. It's likely that your newer disk will be faster than the older
>ones.
>
>Unless it's a 140GB drive (right, Drew? ;-))..
>
4GB commodity disk? That's gotta be about 6 years old, right? Guaranteed
any new disk (except laptop gear, which I know almost nothing about)
will seek faster. It's almost guaranteed to die in the next year or two
anyway. Personally, I'd throw the 4GB in the trash. Or crack it open and
make some ninja frisbees.
If you're dead set on keeping it, you could use it for a log partition,
or something that gets mostly sequential writes without seeing too much
performance degradation. You really want to learn about SMART before you
move any data onto that disk though.
If you haven't picked your new drive, I'd suggest a WD Raptor (assuming
that you've got good power and cooling in your chassis, obviously). Last
I checked (about 7 months ago), they had the best seek times. Which is
not a big surprise since they based on mid-range SCSI disks with a SATA
interface. They're also 10kRPM disks, so sequential reads and writes can
really get some value out of that SATA interface. They aren't
particularly cheap however.
Drew
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list