LCD / Video Card advice request
Tim Writer
tim-s/rLXaiAEBtBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Wed Apr 28 17:11:45 UTC 2004
"Lennart Sorensen" <lsorense-1wCw9BSqJbv44Nm34jS7GywD8/FfD2ys at public.gmane.org> writes:
> ATI is still off my buy list. Great hardware. Terrible software. That
> has been ATI for me for the last 12 years. I see little sign of that
> changing. I have been buying nVidia hardware for the last 4 years when
> I needed a video card, and I haven't regretted it yet.
>
> Lennart Sorensen
Don't know if it's the hardware of software but they're off my list too. I
recently got my hands on a new Radeon VE w/ 64MB (?). Now I know VE is for
"value edtion" so I shouldn't expect much but I was running an 8 year old PCI
Matrox MGA Millenium w/ 4MB. To cut a long story short, running glxgears
with the ATI gave me a wopping 200+ frames per second, up from 160+ w/ the
Matrox. In contrast, my bottom of the line, 1 year old Dell Notebook with
Intel i830 graphics chipset, gets 350+ frames per second. Approximately, one
month after installation, the Radeon VE failed. Needless to say, I'm back to
my trusty Matrox.
--
tim writer <tim-s/rLXaiAEBtBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org> starnix inc.
905.771.0017 ext. 225 thornhill, ontario, canada
http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list