Anti spam solutions

[JoeHill]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 22:04:50 -0400
William Park <opengeometry-FFYn/CNdgSA at public.gmane.org> uttered:

> 
> Yes.  But, what does that have to do with making SENDER to pay for the
> cost of email?

I think we went over that already, but I'll spell it out for you again:

1. You are punishing the wrong person. The spammer should pay, not his
victims.

2. Adding another layer of cost to communication over the internet
merely serves to shut even more people out of the benefits which lie
therein.

> Bitching about corporation (or people) having too much money does not
> serve Linux market.  They have money because people give them money.
> Instead, we should be asking "what can we do to make people give us
> the money."

Watch your tone, bud. I never "bitched" about anybody having too much
money. Nor, I believe did Kareem.

-- 
JoeHill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nasrudin walked into a teahouse and declaimed, "The moon is more useful
than the sun."
	"Why?", he was asked.
	"Because at night we need the light more."
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml