GUI
Anton Markov
anton-F0u+EriZ6ihBDgjK7y7TUQ at public.gmane.org
Fri Nov 28 13:39:29 UTC 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Excuse me, but I will have to disagree:
James Knotty wrote:
| You might want to read up on how Microsoft used extortion etc., to force
| market share. You can find lots of info in books such as Netscape Time,
| The Microsoft Files, World War 3.0 and of course the trial transcript.
| One example of this, was when Windows 95 came out, and IBM wanted to
| sell it on it's systems, along with OS/2, MS refused to let them have
| W95, until they stopped supporting OS/2. Then there was the bundling,
| where MS would make computer suppliers pay for a Windows licence on
| every system sold, even if shipped with a competing OS etc. Do a bit of
| research and you'll see that's MS dominance had nothing to do with
| product quality and everything to do with "dirty tricks".
I would call that marketing genius. Imagine making a product that would
force other companies to say "OS/2 is good, but we want to sell Windows
so much that we'll give it up." The companies had every right to refuse
the Microsoft deals; they just wouldn't be selling Windows. That is not
extortion.
| How productive would a secretary be, if she has to stop typing a letter,
| when she's formatting a diskette? That's one example of MS
| productivity. Also, many of the "innovations" in Windows, were
| "borrowed" from elsewhere. The desktop is one example. You may also
| recall the Stacker case, where MS stole their disk compression
| technology. There are other examples, some of which are mentioned in
| the above sources. And of course lets not forget the deliberate
| "incompatibilies" is Windows, which prevented it from working with
| DR-DOS. All that incompatibility was, was a check to see if it was
| running on DR-DOS and then crap out with an error message. Bypass that
| check and it ran fine.
Now that's a totally different issue. Microsoft products do lack
usability at the expense of a good first impression. Then again, if
people are willing to buy them, then it's the people that need to change
not the software.
"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" ~Anon
And for the already-educated there is Linux ... and Mac.
- --
Anton Markov <("anton" + "@" + "truxtar" + "." + "com")>
GnuPGP Key fingerprint =
5546 A6E2 1FFB 9BB8 15C3 CE34 46B7 8D93 3AD1 44B4
~ "The difference between insanity and genius is measured only by success."
~ - Some bad guy from 007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/x1ARRreNkzrRRLQRApEUAJ9GZdPbowxaIZTrbUuwlRK/yDJrDACcDcMN
yDix5GW4mUylS7RZw0llXqk=
=qKc0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group. Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml
More information about the Legacy
mailing list