SOT: shitfs in spam trends and topics

[Mel Wilson]

In article <20031202130036.8DF5F4054-xzRQuAxiFLNWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org>, cbbrowne at acm.org wrote:
>The odd trend I have been seeing is for there to be large numbers of
>spam messages that seem totally futile.  There's no way of contacting
>them to buy their services.  No URLs.  No valid return address.  No way
>for the message to be of any value whatever, supposing I _did_ want to
>increase my breasts by a couple of sizes.

Two possibilities I can imagine.

1. Spammers acutely aware that they are wrong, and defying
   the world to catch them, even if it means losing a sale.

2. Steganography.

        Regards.        Mel.
--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://tlug.ss.org
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://tlug.ss.org/subscribe.shtml