[GTALUG] Heads up: Ubuntu 21.10 kills your desktop icons
Giles Orr
gilesorr at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 12:46:40 EDT 2021
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 11:03, Lennart Sorensen via talk <talk at gtalug.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:47:30AM -0400, Michael Hill via talk wrote:
> > I prefer the elegant design and centralized vision of the GNOME
> > desktop, but the whininess of the GNOME hatred here never gets old.
>
> When a desktop going from version 2 to 3 throws away everything users
> are used to, and the developers simply don't care, then it deserves any
> hate it receives.
>
> If they wanted to have a totally new vision (which is perfectly fine to
> do), they should have started a new project, not hijacked an existing one.
I think that Lennart has just reduced the whole problem to one
sentence. A new vision is good - the history of Linux is littered
with "new visions," most of them long deceased ... however, the ones
that succeed move us forward. But GNOME - as he points out - didn't
so much create a new vision as simultaneously hijacking and destroying
an old one. Hugh sees this as a rewrite, but when almost nothing of
the former "vision" or paradigm remains, it's really a new project.
And yeah, if you spin it off as a new project you may be abandoning
the old one - but at least if you abandon it there's an opportunity
for someone to pick it up ...
Which brings up an interesting point. As much as people scream about
GNOME3, I don't think anyone forked GNOME2, which they're more than
welcome to do. Someone offended by KDE4 forked KDE3 and carried it on
as the Trinity Desktop Environment ( http://www.trinitydesktop.org/ ),
which is still going. So I guess the GNOME3 haters just aren't that
motivated ...
If anyone is wondering where I stand on this (I'm sure most don't care
but one or two might) - I never liked GNOME2, and I really dislike the
behaviour of GNOME3. But I don't have any skin in the game because I
still use Openbox on most machines (with 'fbpanel' and 'dmenu' or
'rofi' as a launcher). If I feel the need for a full desktop, LXQt
isn't bad and lighter weight than the alternatives.
--
Giles
https://www.gilesorr.com/
gilesorr at gmail.com
More information about the talk
mailing list