[GTALUG] New Desktop PC -- debian Linux - Proposed 2 TB HDD Partitioning;
Lennart Sorensen
lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca
Wed Apr 11 11:12:07 EDT 2018
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:58:05AM -0400, Steve Petrie, P.Eng. via talk wrote:
> Warm Greetings To GTALUG Members,
>
> This coming weekend (Friday 13 April 2018) I will be building my new desktop PC with the help of my friend who has built quite a few PCs for his employer.
>
> The new PC will be running debian Linux and will soon take over duties from an ancient Dell desktop PC running Windows XP (acquired new in March 2005)..
>
> I will post the final hardware configuration on PCPartPicker once the new PC is operational.
>
> * * *
> * * *
>
> Meanwhile, I would like to ask GTALUG members please to itake a look at the partitioning configuraiton I am proposing for the 2 TB Western Digital HDD (best to stretch your email client window to defeat word wrap):
> ==> *** STANDARD LINUX ***
>
> /device partition
>
> ==> linux normal boot #1: (current active version of linux os, will be recycled for next version)
> /dev/sda1 gpt001 ext2 ??? /boot
> /dev/sda2 gpt002 ext3 50 / (root), /bin, /dev, /etc, /initrd, /lib, sbin
>
> ==> linux normal boot #2: (next version of linux os, will become current version)
> /dev/sda1 gpt003 ext2 ??? /boot
> /dev/sda2 gpt004 ext3 50 / (root), /bin, /dev, /etc, /initrd, /lib, sbin
>
> ==> linux rescue boot:
> /dev/sda1 gpt005 ext2 ??? /boot
> /dev/sda2 gpt006 ext3 50 / (root), /bin, /dev, /etc, /initrd, /lib, sbin
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 150 GB + 3X boot
>
> ==> linux temporary:
> /dev/sda3 gpt103 ext4 64 (swap1)
> /dev/sda4 gpt104 ext4 64 (swap2)
> /dev/sda5 gpt105 ext4 64 (swap3)
> /dev/sda6 gpt106 ext4 200 /tmp
> -------------------------------------------------
> 392 GB
>
> ==> linux permanent:
> /dev/sda7 gpt207 ext4 100 /var
> /dev/sda8 gpt208 ext4 100 /usr
>
> ==> linux user permanent:
> /dev/sda9 gpt309 ext4 100 /usr/local
> /dev/sda10 gpt310 ext4 100 /home
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 400 GB
>
>
> ==> *** USER-DEFINED ***
>
> /dev/sda51 gpt551..557 ext4 75X7 /!_d ... /!_j (current, clone winxp partition structure, allow for growth)
> /dev/sda52 gpt599 ext4 70 /!~dell (WinXP archive C..J: ../winxp_c .. ../winxp_j (WinXP archive C..J))
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 595 GB
>
> ==> other operating systems:
> /dev/sda61 gpt661 ext4 ??? /._win7 virtualized windows 7
> /dev/sda62 gpt662 ext4 ??? /._win7_1
> /dev/sda63 gpt663 ext4 ??? /._dfly virtualized dragonflybsd
> /dev/sda64 gpt664 ext4 ??? /._dfly_1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ??? GB
>
> ==> ssd partitions:
> /dev/sda71 gpt771 ext4 -- /.~ssd01 (ssd partition) | total ssd
> /dev/sda72 gpt772 ext4 -- /.~ssd02 (ssd partition) | capacity
> /dev/sda73 gpt773 ext4 -- /.~ssd03 (ssd partition) | 256 GB
> --------- --------- ---- ----- -----------------------------------------------
> N/A GB
>
> ==> allocated: 1537 GB (+ 3x boot)
> ==> unallocated: + 463 GB (- 3x boot)
> --------- --------- ---- ----- -----------------------------------------------
> ==> Total HDD Capacity: 2000 GB
> Note 1: Please be aware that I am a complete Linux newbie but with a software engineering background.
>
> Note 2: Hoping to be able to swap back and forth between an "active" version of Linux and the "next" version of Linux, by switching the roles of partitions (gpt001, gpt002) <==> (gpt003,gpt004) .
>
> Note 3: Please be aware that I intend to maintain most of my user-related content in the seven (7) partitions gpt551..gpt557
>
> * * *
> * * *
>
> Comments, criticisms, questions welcome.
Do you actually work on your computer or do you spend all day shuffling
bits of old OSs around?
Where is the UEFI boot partition?
I would never waste time or space on a rescue boot. I have USB keys
for that.
I keep one OS linux installed and maintained. I have never had a problem
upgrading that needed a reinstall. My Debian 2.0 install lasted until
486 support was dropped from Debian. I forget what version that
eventually was. I keep one windows install. I can't imagine a benefit
of doing anything more complex and can think of a ton of reasons not to
have more.
As for virtualized, disk images are simpler and lets you thrown them
all one one partition. Sure raw partitions can have slight performance
benefits, but are a lot less flexible. If you want the performance and
flexibility, use LVM not partitions.
Why is there any ext3 involved? I can understand ext2 for a small boot
partition, but can't think of any good reason to use ext3 for anything
these days. ext4 is just better now.
--
Len Sorensen
More information about the talk
mailing list