[GTALUG] Firefox memory usage (was GTALUG Meeting on Tuesday 10 October at 7:30pm)

ted leslie ted.leslie at gmail.com
Sun Oct 1 18:35:15 EDT 2017


I hear yeah, I will be trying to get FF to  work as well as vivaldi and
chrome+GS for tab suspend/hibernate, will post what i find.
I have had probably 200+ tabs, for all I know hibernation/suspend could
handle many 1000's tabs, i will try for kicks.
Technically it saves very little for each tab once hibernated. I have a
work flow for having many stackoverflow (or similar) pages up, need for few
days, then
reduce them down to bookmarks if interested, or dump (most of) them.

"Chromium (AIUI Chrome only works on M$ systems) were perfect ", I don't
understand this statement.
Rarely get crashes, and when do , usually restart says, shutdown incorrect,
here are your tabs if you want. (viv, chrome, ff, all seem to do this).


-tl

On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 5:40 PM, o1bigtenor <o1bigtenor at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 2:56 PM, ted leslie <ted.leslie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> two word solution : tab hibernation. vivaldi, chrome and ff all have
>> different solutions, but as i do, with many tabs open 60+, if you don't TH
>> your screwed.
>> With "great suspender" on chrome, you can custom set up the hibernation,
>> it works insanely well. Vivaldi works well out of box with its hibernation,
>> ff i am not sure about,
>> I use it for certain things so I will have to research what they offer
>> for TH.
>> But directly to your point, Chrome with GS handles your set up and even
>> 10x more! with out even breaking a sweat, and uses about the memory
>> required by just the non suspend tabs. I do 60+ tabs on 3 GB ram (vmguest
>> 1-2 cpu assignment) no issue.
>>
>> Interesting points - - - but - - - - when I ran into trouble the one
> time, FF crashed, I think I was at 22 windows and something like 350 tabs
> so even 60+ isn't reassurance. Secondly I decided I didn't want the
> Alphabet (soup) company sticking my nose in my business and trying to soak
> other suckers for advertising revenue. I was looking for specific kind of
> product and spent about 15 or maybe it was even 20 hours of time trying to
> find it. I tried searches using every kind of permutation I could think of
> using ms. google, I tried phone calls to local in the same generic class of
> item suppliers, I used what used to be the american equivalent to Frazers
> (a huge 15, or more, volume set of books of suppliers with addresses and
> line cards and and and) online search engine. Well I know the product
> exists - - - saw it on a number of different manufacturers products in
> Europe - - - the worst was getting ads on the wrong stuff attached to
> everything I was looking at - - - my email (gmail accounts!), weather
> information, any other products I was searching for - - - so I decided I
> just don't want to be tracked anymore. Chrome is part of the alphabet soup
> companies empire so the second point is that I don't want to be tracked at
> 'everything' I'm doing. So even if Chromium (AIUI Chrome only works on M$
> systems) were perfect - - - I would have a very difficult time using it - -
> - but its not perfect - - - I did try it at about version 36 to 39 or
> thereabouts - - - and it was as much a dog at allowing web searches - - -
> in fact it crashed with far fewer tabs and windows.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Dee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20171001/eb01d6ed/attachment.html>


More information about the talk mailing list