[GTALUG] mysterious restarts
Alvin Starr
alvin at netvel.net
Wed Jun 22 16:35:06 EDT 2016
On 06/22/2016 01:25 PM, Jamon Camisso via talk wrote:
> On 2016-06-22 17:46, D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk wrote:
>> Remember, he truncated the values (grep does not round).
>>
>> My best guess: the average of the readings would be from a
>> distribution centred on 59.996435 (0.005 larger than Lennart
>> calculated). It could be as low as 59.991435 or as high as 60.991434,
>> assuming six digits of precision in the fraction. I know nothing
>> about accuracy of the device.
>>
>> Summary: the 60Hz hypothesis is not excluded by the evidence. Far
>> from it.
>>
>> P.S. "grep -c" eliminates the need for "wc -l".
> and sort/uniq eliminate even more:
>
> cat /tmp/MGC|sort -n |uniq -c
> 16 FREQ value 59.95
> 99 FREQ value 59.96
> 282 FREQ value 59.97
> 464 FREQ value 59.98
> 459 FREQ value 59.99
> 385 FREQ value 60.00
> 302 FREQ value 60.01
> 144 FREQ value 60.02
> 68 FREQ value 60.03
> 3 FREQ value 60.04
> ---
> Talk Mailing List
> talk at gtalug.org
> https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
Another question is how accurate is the device doing the measurements.
If this is a UPS then the monitoring is not designed for accurate
frequency measurements.
Get out your 6+ digit frequency counter and then run the tests.
--
Alvin Starr || voice: (905)513-7688
Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
alvin at netvel.net ||
More information about the talk
mailing list