[GTALUG] Backups for files
o1bigtenor
o1bigtenor at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 13:45:54 UTC 2015
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:05 PM, D. Hugh Redelmeier <hugh at mimosa.com> wrote:
> | From: o1bigtenor <o1bigtenor at gmail.com>
>
> | A tip - - - some of the drives marketed as applicable to NAS raid arrays really
> | aren't applicable. You need to be purchasing drives that have ERC or error
> | recovery control. I was slapped upside the head because I had drives that didn't
> | have that but when I bought the drives (early 2012) NOBODY was talking about
> | that.
>
> I've heard that some RAID systems do know how to deal with such
> drives. I haven't researched which ones.
>
> Lots of us were talking about this (whining, actually). I usually
> called it TLER, Western Digital's term for it. ERC is Seagate's name.
> CCTL was used by Samsung and Hitachi.
>
> Earlier it was possible to tell a drive to limit error recovery time.
> Then the drive manufacturers locked this feature out on their cheap
> drives. Grrr.
This sounds like a problem looking for a solution -- - - a software
hack to fix a
hardware problem - - - I know 0 about programming or I would be looking into
it already!
>
> Disks with TLER / ERC / CCTL & LCC [Table of drives] (2011 March)
> <http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1590200>
>
> I posted to this list:
> From: D. Hugh Redelmeier <hugh at mimosa.com>
> To: tlug at ss.org
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:58:59 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: [TLUG]: 3TB Harddisk sale
>
> | From: Anthony de Boer <adb at adb.ca>
>
> | I expect I'll be trying the WD RE4 Lennart mentions next.
>
> My understanding is that RE and non-RE are the same EXCEPT for "TLER"
> (a trivial firmware difference).
>
> Without TLER, RAID won't work. A drive will spend so much time
> recovering from a simple local error that the controller will declare
> the whole drive offline. That is a big failure. It generally
> requires the array to be rebuilt, possibly taking longer than the
> actual MTBF!
>
> That's how they do "market segmentation". Market segmentation is a
> vendor's dream: sell essentially the same product at two different
> price points.
>
> If the drive manufacturing industry were not an oligopoly, this price
> differentiation would disappear. In fact, I think Samsung's normal
> drives were capable of TLER; that's been fixed by Seagate taking them
> over.
> ---
Very interesting - - - time for some hacker ingenuity!!!
Anyone that knows this stuff care to hand out some pointers?
Dee
More information about the talk
mailing list