[GTALUG] interesting new approach to forking

[Russell Reiter]

On 2/19/15, David Collier-Brown <davec-b at rogers.com> wrote:
> Plonk!

Exactly this is MY art, I'm just trying to practice it. I only have
one racket and one skill, my ractet is C# and my skill is accounts
receiveables. Any one heel who knows me IRL can tell you that. It's
the shitheels in the basement playing base all the time that BUG me
the most.

I pwn this snippet and others. Pay up or I'm gonna tell the boss and I
go EOA and then you're all on your own.

OG FREESTYLE
AUTHCODE 2B@!@B

> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 17:21:09 -0500
> Subject: OBJECT REDACTED CRI FORM THORN ODIN LOKI OMITUS
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "r reiter" <goethe123321 at hotmail.com>
> To: tlug at ss.org
> Subject: rWe1LwArsYt if [true|tr (guano,metle) :) Bless(you)|all
> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:31:53 -0500
OBJECT REDACTED CRI THORN ODIN LOKI
> END
> BEGAT$
> Megwitch
> Megwitch
> Megwitch

>
> --dave
>
> On 02/19/2015 10:51 AM, Russell Reiter wrote:
>> The Trochedactyl says, save the earth, eat a Tree whugger today.
>>
>> On 2/19/15, Lennart Sorensen <lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:02:56PM -0600, Russell Reiter wrote:
>>>> <SNIP>
>>>>> What do any of those have to do with VLIW?
>>>> No offence intended, but check your notes on DELTA vs. WYSE AC Power.
>>>> I believe I have pontificated on this list about that quite enough in
>>>> the last decade to correct YOUR errors Lennart.
>>>>
>>>> You didn't even know what the centre tap is, so how could you be
>>>> expected to understand dirty AC and the power's relationship to 64 bit
>>>> ARCH, VLIW, UART, LSBinit, SGML, HTML, XML, dependency based booting
>>>> in Debian, or why they are called script kittys, or the universe in
>>>> near and far field effects, randomness and time modification in
>>>> transmissions.
>>>>
>>>>> They apply equality to CISC and RISC as well, but at least those tend
>>>>> to be designed to run real code generated by real compilers rather
>>>>> than
>>>>> imagined code generated by imagined magical compilers that don't
>>>>> exist.
>>>> Whatever exists in your imagination regarding real compilers and
>>>> imagined magical ones are just another ponzi scheme of big oil money
>>>> IT, apparently now centred in Alberta. The rest of us try to use a
>>>> DELPHI consensus of experts, sort of a Canadian Intelligence Agency.
>>>>
>>>> I cut my teeth on the IBM blue wire fix, no reason for me to jump ship
>>>> now. I've been pushing for clean air and clean power in Toronto for a
>>>> long time. God bless IBM for opening up their architecture when every
>>>> one else was closing up shop. I wonder why they did that?
>>>>
>>>> I might be premature but I believe a trusted compiler is in the works,
>>>> it just needs some funding after the dirty power issue is cleaned up
>>>> bit bya bit.
>>>>
>>>> Regression testing is a bitch, but you do have to do it one tiny bit
>>>> at a time. Believe me I spend a shit-load of time trying to fix up my
>>>> own mistakes but the bosses won't let me, so I just have to eat them.
>>> I think you win the price for the most incomprehensible message I have
>>> ever seen on this list.
>>>
>>> None of what you wrote had anything to do with what you replied to.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Len Sorensen
>>> ---
>>> Talk Mailing List
>>> talk at gtalug.org
>>> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>>
>> ---
>> Talk Mailing List
>> talk at gtalug.org
>> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>>
>
>
> --
> David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
> System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
> davecb at spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain
>
> ---
> Talk Mailing List
> talk at gtalug.org
> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>