[GTALUG] interesting new approach to forking
D. Hugh Redelmeier
hugh at mimosa.com
Wed Feb 11 22:50:21 UTC 2015
| From: Russell Reiter <rreiter91 at gmail.com>
| This looks like a false flag operation to me. Skull vs. Bones.
Not sure what you mean. Are you saying that Cyanogen Inc. might be
simply a spoiling attack from Microsoft on Google/Android under the
Cyanogen Inc. flag?
| From: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
| So of course at this point any sane person would know that Cyanogen is
| not to be trusted at all. Don't make any deal with them, because they
| don't care about you at all.
Yeah. I wonder how much damage this does to One+One owners in the
future.
| I wonder if even Microsoft might start to regret getting involved
| with them.
Perhaps not if the aim is just to bring disrepute and confusion to the Android
world.
What I don't understand is how much Cyanogen Mod is just Cyanogen Inc.
I always thought that Cyanogen Mod was a real plus for the Android
community and hence probably useful for Google. For one thing, it was
a way of keeping the device manufacturers a little in line (if the
device manufacturers went too far, their customers would jump ship to
CM). For another, it meant Android had some hacker cred.
I am now (with insufficient research) thinking that I might want to
avoid CM so as to stay out of the clutches of CI.
More information about the talk
mailing list