sipxecs behind NAT

[Dave Cramer]

This is my masquerade rule:

MASQUERADE  all  --  192.168.122.0/24    !192.168.122.0/24

I'm curious why sipxecs would even put the internal IP in the packet ?

Dave Cramer


On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jamon Camisso
<jamon.camisso-H217xnMUJC0sA/PxXw9srA at public.gmane.org>wrote:

> On 03/20/2014 11:18 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> > I have almost everything working, except RTP events once the call is
> > established. I've tracked it down to the fact that the phone is sending
> the
> > RTP events to the internal IP address behind the NAT. I have setup the
> > external address on the server.
> >
> > Any ideas ?
>
> Sounds like a missing MASQUERADE rule if it is getting the internal IP.
>
> Given you have an established connection I assume your FORWARD rules are
> working.
>
> Cheers, Jamon
>
> --
> The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
> TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
> How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20140320/1e1d00a9/attachment.html>