SystemD on Debian

Tim Tisdall tisdall-DXT9u3ndKiSh7up9GtFB90EOCMrvLtNR at public.gmane.org
Fri Feb 14 17:00:32 UTC 2014


I was just starting to learn and like Upstart!  It allowed me to run code
as a daemon even if it hadn't been developed to properly fork as a daemon.


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>wrote:

> People have doubtless heard of the "Debian Init controversy" <
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd>
>
> The following two emails represent the summarization of voting on the
> matter that took place the other day.
>
> The technicalities of how they analyzed the votes to come to conclusion
> are reasonably interesting.
>
> All members of the committee voted on all the options, which led to
> various "pairwise defeats" of a number of the options, bringing the
> feasible options down to ( U, D ) (e.g. - Upstart and SystemD).  Chairman
> BDale held a further deciding vote, which went to SystemD.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/02/msg00402.html
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/02/msg00405.html
>
> Debian docs on SystemD...
> https://wiki.debian.org/systemd
>
> Relevant news today that is of interest; Mark Shuttleworth blogged <
> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1316> that he will be asking for
> Ubuntu to adopt SystemD as well.
> --
> When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
> question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gtalug.org/pipermail/legacy/attachments/20140214/6d69e431/attachment.html>


More information about the Legacy mailing list