Fwd: [Cryptography] History and implementation status of Opportunistic Encryption for IPsec (fwd)

[James Knott]

D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
> As usual, DCB's mail still doesn't get reflected by the TLUG list.
> I've trimmed his quoting.
>
> There were two Hughs in FreeS/WAN, big (Hugh Daniel) and little (me).
> The original post was in honour of the former.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Collier-Brown <davec-b-bJEeYj9oJeDQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org>
> To: tlug-lxSQFCZeNF4 at public.gmane.org, William Muriithi <william.muriithi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
> Cc: D. Hugh Redelmeier <hugh-pmF8o41NoarQT0dZR+AlfA at public.gmane.org>
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:21:53 -0400
> Subject: Re: [TLUG]: Fwd: [Cryptography] History and implementation status of
>     Opportunistic Encryption for IPsec
> Reply-To: davecb-0XdUWXLQalXR7s880joybQ at public.gmane.org
>
> On 09/11/2013 10:23 PM, William Muriithi wrote:
>> This post offer more information on a recent discussion we had here of
>> opportunist encryption
>>
>> Thought it may be interesting read for the group
>

Is there a link to that "interesting read"?


--
The Toronto Linux Users Group.      Meetings: http://gtalug.org/
TLUG requests: Linux topics, No HTML, wrap text below 80 columns
How to UNSUBSCRIBE: http://gtalug.org/wiki/Mailing_lists